Lottery plans fade away
If the Barbados Cricket Association (BCA) had returned to the bargaining tables, a decision could have been reached to satisfy all the players in the lottery game
Sherrylyn Clarke
28-Dec-2001
If the Barbados Cricket Association (BCA) had returned to
the bargaining tables, a decision could have been reached to
satisfy all the players in the lottery game.
Steve Stoute, president of the Barbados Olympic Association
(BOA), was reacting to the announcement of the cricket
association's lottery.
After the BCA made their final decision, there has been no
official dialogue since then between us. Certainly, if the
BCA had come back to the table from the BOA perspective we
would have been receptive, Stoute said.
My response would be one of regret that the sporting bodies
couldn't respond to the Prime Minister's plea to formulate a
lottery to finance sport in Barbados.
The BCA recently announced they would be going ahead to join
with the Leeward Islands Lottery Holding Company (LILHC) to
have their own lottery, independent of the merger between
the BOA, the Barbados Turf Club and the National Sports
Council.
Stoute stands firmly behind the view that the market is too
small for two lotteries.
I don't think the market can really sustain two lotteries.
We have two lotteries going right now and the revenues have
been reduced substantially not in profitability. They are
still profitable, but for the various sporting bodies to be
aggressively fighting each other for market share, it is in
my opinion a sad commentary, he said.
The long-serving administrator said the pie had to be
divided among those four players and Government also wanted
a fund for culture and the arts, but the offer to the BCA
was fair and equitable.