CMJ: England can defy the odds (02 June 1997)
Christopher Martin-Jenkins
02-Jun-1997
Monday 2 June 1997
England can defy the odds
Christopher Martin-Jenkins.
ENGLAND have their best chance for 10 years to win the Ashes
this summer and I believe they will succeed.
Not by much; not because they are necessarily, man for man, a
better side, but because they possess a stable batting order and
two bowlers in Darren Gough and Robert Croft who, at their best
and in the weather conditions which are forecast for the first
three Tests, would cancel Glenn McGrath and Shane Warne. Most
important of all, they at last look like playing as a team
whose sum is greater than the parts.
There are negative factors too in the equation. The Australians have started their tour imperfectly and may find that
pitch as well as weather conditions are less in their favour
than they were when they thrashed the old country 4-0, 3-0, 4-1
and 3-1 in the last four series at home and away. Moreover, the
long saga over Mark Taylor`s batting form has reached an uncomfortable climax in the first fortnight in England.
His early form would not have been so critical but for the decision of Australia`s tour-planners to settle for only three
weeks, and two first-class matches, in which to prepare for the
first of the six Tests. This was not why Graham Halbish was
sacked as chief executive of the Australian Cricket Board and
final decisions were discussed with the coach, Geoff Marsh; but
they should have known that, given England`s unpre- dictable
early-season climate, this was at best a gamble, at worst
folly. In the event they have got more cricket, per- haps,
than they deserved, but the real genesis of the problem was a
tour of India followed by demanding series at home against the
West Indies and away in South Africa. If the series ahead is as
tough as England ought to be capable of making it, one or two of
the Australian bowlers are almost bound to become injured.
Having been picked as tour captain, Taylor should lead his side
at Edgbaston. He scored 839 in 11 Test innings in his first series in England in 1989, managed only two fifties in 1990-91 but
averaged well over 40 and scored 428 and 471 respectively in
10 innings in the last two series. However, since last getting
past 50 against Sri Lanka in Perth in December 1995, his scores
against four different countries have been 7, 25, 21, 10, 27, 37,
43, 36, 27, 16, 7, 10, 11, 2, 1, 16, 8, 13, 38, 5.
He is due, it seems, either for a century or for a duck, and
much will depend, no doubt, on which it is. If he is left out
sooner or later, Steve Waugh would relish the chal- lenge,
but he would not have history on his side. Before Taylor, Ian
Chappell lost his first Test as captain against England and Greg
Chappell, Graham Yallop, Kim Hughes and Allan Border all lost
their first series.
TIME will tell how Taylor`s embarrassment has affected his team.
Under his intuitive and decent-minded leadership Australia followed up their triumphant bearding of the West Indian lion in
his den by beating them at home and South Africa away in successive series. Strictly on the formbook, therefore, England
have no chance. Australia are rated the best team in the world,
whichever computer analyses recent results, with England only
sixth best of the nine countries who play Test cricket.
The 3-0 win in the Texaco Trophy was not much of a guide to
the outcome of the Cornhill Tests, because England selected oneday specialists, but it continued the upward curve apparent since
they, and their critics, underestimated the difficul- ties of
beating Zimbabwe on their own pitches.
Only twice have there been signs of the old tendency of England
sides to play as individuals rather than for their team and country since they began to turn the corner in Auckland in January.
They failed in the end there but the experience of not winning
a match New Zealand had effectively lost by lunch on the
last day proved beneficial and at Christchurch a month later
they won after being 118 runs behind on first innings.
The two exceptions to the unity of purpose which developed after the setbacks in Zimbabwe were the run-outs of John Crawley at Auckland and again at Lord`s in the third one-day international against Australia. On both occasions there
seemed an element of stubbornness from both parties as Crawley
went charging on while Graham Thorpe stuck to his crease with
equal determination to preserve his wicket.
But they are high-class players and two of five England batsmen -
Mike Atherton, Alec Stewart and Nasser Hussain are the others
- who ought to be able to bat this summer without that feeling
of insecurity which has worked against the side for so long:
that vicious circle of failures demanding team changes, leading
to instability and further failure.
Whether the bowling attack can achieve a similar secu- rity of
tenure is less certain and here lies the key to the series.
Already since Christchurch, where his batting proved invaluable while his bowling fell away, Dominic Cork has fallen by the
wayside, forced to have a long rest by a strained mus- cle in
his upper thigh, and if Adam Hollioake is the man to replace
him at Edgbaston, it will be a batsman who bowls taking over
from a bowler who bats.
At his best, and properly focused, Cork must be in the team,
just like Darren Gough. Of the others, only the tigerish Croft
is sure of his place. Phil Tufnell is being pushed for his by
Ashley Giles and after Andrew Caddick, about whom the jury remain locked in debate, Devon Malcolm, Dean Headley, Alex Tudor,
Martin McCague and a small army of left-arm over-the-wicket
bowlers are eager to play.
If Australia are to retain the Ashes this summer, the likelihood
is that it will have been a dry summer, allowing McGrath and
Jason Gillespie to use their pace and the great leg-spinner,
Shane Warne, to build still further on his wonderful record
against England of 61 wickets in 11 Tests. In eight Tests since
his recovery from the operation on his spinning finger, Warne
has taken 33 wickets in eight Tests at 26 runs each.
That seems to answer fairly conclusively those who say that he
is not the bowler he was. I saw him bowling Shivnarine Chanderpaul in Sydney last November with a ball which turned more than
the one which famously beat Mike Gatting at Old Trafford in
1993. There has been a tendency to bowl rather more loose balls
than he used to, and perhaps to restrict his variations too,
but he remains the single most potent reason for Australia`s
odds-on favouritism.
The three Ws - Warne and the Waugh brothers - with Mc- Grath,
the speedy Gillespie, a reinstated Michael Slater and the talented and formidably dedicated Michael Bevan make up the
greater part of what could prove a highly effective side. There
are daily reminders in county cricket from the likes of Stuart
Law and Darren Lehmann of how much strength in depth there is
in Australia and it may only need one of Justin Langer, Ricky
Ponting or Matthew Elliott to have a prolific summer to help the
more established players to make a nonsense of En- glish optimism.
Certainly the home bowlers will need to be utterly disciplined
if they are to undermine the Australian batting. Steve Waugh,
for example, is vulnerable only to good-length bowling around
his off stump. Totally focused and wonderfully consistent, he
goes back to good-length balls even from spinners, but he scores
easily off anything to the leg side of middle or too wide of
his off stump. Much the same is true of his brother Mark. Only
by playing to a plan against each of their opponents, and sticking to it, will England prevail.
THE weather would help them if it were moist during Test
matches and the prediction from the long-range experts, Weather
Action, is that there is a strong possibility of thundery rain
in each of the first three Tests. The ball has to be moving
about, off the seam and through the air, if Australia are to be
bowled out twice sufficiently often.
Later in the season, perhaps, the dry atmosphere and correspondingly dry pitches which have been characteristic of recent
seasons will set in again. They suited Australia in 1989 and
1993 and it is probably no coincidence that there was more rain
about in the summers of 1977, 1981 and 1985 when teams led by
Greg Chappell, Kim Hughes and Allan Border all left England without the Ashes.
Perhaps it is no coincidence either that Ian Botham, Bob
Willis, David Gower and Graham Gooch were all available to England then too (Botham played in all three series, Willis in
the first two, Gower and Gooch in the last two) but the weather
played its part, make no mistake.
Witness also the success in 1981 of the English-style swing
bowler, Terry Alderman, though eight years later, with 41 more
wickets in six Tests, he showed what could also be done in a dry
summer by a truly accurate swing bowler, especially one encouraged by his own team`s huge scoring.
For Michael Atherton the next three months present a chance
for which he has been working for four tough years, that of leading a stable side who believe in themselves and are good enough
to win. If they do, the winter tour to the West Indies need
hold no fears. Atherton`s own performances with the bat remain
very important to his team`s chances, but no longer necessarily does his personal success offer the only guarantee against
humiliation.
For David Lloyd, as coach, the wait has been shorter, but he
set out his stall after the 3-0 win in the Texaco Trophy:
"We all saw the accusations made by Mark Waugh about English
cricketers before the start of the tour. He has played in county
cricket and was identifying some of the areas that we know
about ourselves. But within the England set-up we are striving to
get a team who the country can identify with. I want committed players and players with passion. I want to get stability and
confidence and to build a team. We are nothing like there at
the moment but I believe that in the England set-up we have got
everything in place."
Whether it has happened soon enough to beat Australia this summer we shall know by August, but it is certainly better than
the 4-1 chance the bookmakers are quoting.
Source :: The Electronic Telegraph (https://www.telegraph.co.uk/)