PTV should have its own commentators
Under the lights, the team bowling second was clearly at a disadvantage because of the dew factor and in Lahore, the lights had also attracted dragon-flies, moths and other flying insects
Omar Kureishi
01-Nov-2000
Under the lights, the team bowling second was clearly at a
disadvantage because of the dew factor and in Lahore, the lights had
also attracted dragon-flies, moths and other flying insects. Moin
Khan was lucky that he won every toss and had the Pakistan think-tank
not botched up the first of the one-day internationals by opting to
bat first and by playing with only five bowlers, Pakistan could have
whitewashed England. By batting first at Karachi, it was evident that
the memory of the Golden Jubilee Quadrangular Tournament had faded
altogether.
By playing five bowlers, it was evident also that nothing had been
learnt by the experience of the semi-final against New Zealand in the
ICC Knock-out tournament in Nairobi. These were pretty elementary
mistakes and even after Pakistan had posted 304, I received a
telephone call from Lahore to say "so far, so good," and I said to the
caller that celebrations were premature. Both these mistakes were
rectified at Lahore and Shahid Afridi came into the side and the
luckless Imran Nazir was left out.
There is only one way to prove your critics wrong and that is to go
out there is the middle and perform. And that is precisely what Shahid
Afridi did with both ball and bat. It was the stuff of fairy-tales.
Left out in the first match, to become the Man-of-the-Match in the
second. So emphatic was Pakistan's win at Lahore that one felt that
all that Moin Khan needed to do was to win the toss at Rawalpindi.
Which, against the law of averages, he did.
At Lahore, the spinners had come into their own. The England team
arrived in Pakistan convinced that its batsmen had no clue against
quality spin, which they do not appear to have, but they seem to have
allowed this to play on their minds. As soon as Mushtaq came on to
bowl and turned the first ball prodigiously, England was mentally
reconciled to the fact that its goose was cooked. And they brought
this same frame of mind to Rawalpindi.
Nasser Hussain was unlucky to be given out and one can sympathise with
him though not to the extent that he trashed the dressing-room and
broke a window pane. It was obvious that the England team was all
keyed-up for the Rawalpindi match but, he after all, is the captain.
Against that it can be argued that he is human as were the lawenforcement agencies who resorted to the use of tear-gas outside the
main gate of the pavilion. They can claim, with every justification
that they are provoked but somehow the tear-gassing does not seem
right, nor does the England captain's tantrums.
After having dismissed England for 158, the spinners once again were
magnificent, Saqlain Mushtaq in particular, Pakistan made heavy
weather of knocking off the runs. A modest target, is often, more
difficult to reach than a massive one and Pakistan lost three quick
wickets. Imran Nazir just hung out his bat, as one hangs out the
laundry, Shahid Afridi having hit two fours felt that he could do it
on his own and in boundaries and Salim Elahi just steered Ashley Giles
to first slip as if, giving fielding practice, no footwork of any
kind! It was left to Inzamam-ul-Haq and Yousuf Youhana to steady the
ship and by playing sensible cricket, no heroics of any kind, repaired
the Pakistan innings. It was an out of character innings from Inzamam
and he showed great responsibility.
And then it was left to Abdur Razzaq to finish the job with a
flourish, too brief to be even a cameo, just an impulse of pure joy.
It was the first one-day series win against England since 1974. I was
the manager of that 1974 team. The first match at Trent Bridge was won
by Majid Khan who made a hundred, an innings that I rate as the best I
have ever seen in one-day internationals. He just carved up the
England attack and I recently saw it on video and it had me sitting on
the edge of my seat, as I was, in the dressing room in 1974.
The second match at Edgbaston was won by our fast bowlers, Asif
Masood, Sarfaraz Nawaz and the then babay of the team, Imran Khan. At
lunch we had England 28 for 8 and the England captain, Mike Denness
looked shell-shocked. I put my arm around him and told him: "Sorry
Mike, we did not mean to play it so hard."
But Pakistan cannot rest on its laurels. The more serious business of
test cricket is due to start in a fortnight's time. Obviously Pakistan
should go in with three spinners, Shahid Afridi being the third but
the batting will have to be beefed up and a case can be made for the
recall of Ijaz Ahmed. I would have said Wasti too to open the innings
with Saeed Anwar but I think we should preserver with Imran Nazir. I
think he needs to feel secure and his place in the team should not be
on a performance to performance basis. Pakistan needs a fixed pair of
openers in the test matches as it used to have, Majid and Sadiq
Mohammad and then Mudassar Nazar and Mohsin Khan.
Anyhow, a very good job done by Pakistan and despite all the
mismanagement, those who were able to get inside the grounds, enjoyed
themselves and those watching television even more so. There were many
good performances from the Pakistan side but the man-of-the-series as
far as I am concerned was Abdur Razzaq and from the England side it
would have to David Lloyd, the former manager and now turned
commentator.
Right to the end, he was there, pulling for England and never letting
the viewer forget that Nasser Hussain was the victim of a bad umpiring
decision. I hope for the test matches, PTV will have its own team of
commentators. That too is a home advantage and Pakistan television
viewers should be spared the highly slanted views of former England
players, who, quite rightly, are patriotic. And I hope too that there
will be better crowd management.