Tour and tournament reports

The NatWest Series 2005

NatWest Series 2005, Tournament review, 2005

Julian Guyer
13-Sep-2021
1= England and Australia. 3. Bangladesh
How many matches does it take to determine which are the two best teams out of England, Australia and Bangladesh? The answer: more than people thought. The last NatWest Series before England abandoned the triangular format was much derided in advance for its lopsided line-up.
But the tournament produced a sensational finish - a tied final that provided a tasty appetiser to the outstanding Ashes series that was to follow - and an even more sensational start: world champions Australia lost to Bangladesh in their opening match, the biggest upset in one-day international history. The result provoked delight in Bangladesh, dismay in Australia and hilarity in England, and will be remembered long after the other nine games are forgotten. Even so, that gem of an upset could not obscure the fact that this was an isosceles, not an equilateral triangle. After that lone blip, England and Australia inflicted crushing defeats on Bangladesh, and punched each other to a standstill and a dead-heat in the finish.
A year after failing to make the final in the previous triangular, England maintained the impetus of their 100-run Twenty20 win over Australia with some confident displays. Although both captains repeatedly insisted the matches would have no bearing on the subsequent Tests, every incident was examined minutely for its potential Ashes significance. Though there was a sense that Australia might have got the dust out of their system before the real business began, England's performances were seen as encouraging.
Steve Harmison, the leading wicket-taker with 15, repeatedly troubled Australia's top order with his pace and bounce. Andrew Flintoff, though enduring a disappointing time with the bat, took 12 wickets, while Kevin Pietersen advanced his Test claims with an innings as unorthodox as it was defiant in England's three-wicket win over Australia at Bristol. Geraint Jones moved back down the order from opener to No. 7, where he played the key innings in the final. Andrew Strauss was the leading scorer, with 378.
But Glenn McGrath and Brett Lee frequently made inroads into the top order, most notably in the final, when they had England reeling at 33 for five. It was to their credit that England were resilient enough to recover; it was worrying that they kept having to do so.
It said much for the strength of Australian cricket that, of their three most consistent performers, Lee had not played a Test since January 2004 and neither Andrew Symonds, named man of the series despite being dropped for the first two games after a night on the town, nor Mike Hussey, who frequently repaired early damage to the top order, was in the Ashes squad. For thrilling batting, though, there was no one to touch Bangladesh's Mohammad Ashraful, who followed up a hundred in the win over Australia with fifties in his next two games.

Terms of Use  •  Privacy Policy  •  Your US State Privacy Rights  •  Children's Online Privacy Policy  •  Interest - Based Ads  •  Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information  •  Feedback