Bangladesh: We need a cricket manager (19 Sep 1998)
It had to happen, some good news after two apparently justifiable defeats and one clueless murder - that executed by Northern Ireland
19-Sep-1998
19 September 1998
We need a cricket manager
By Nizamuddin Ahmed
It had to happen, some good news after two apparently justifiable
defeats and one clueless murder - that executed by Northern Ireland.
Test-playing New Zealand were booked for 58. So, why can't Bangladesh
be sent home with 63, eh? At least it takes our name off the register
for scoring the lowest ever total in Commonwealth cricket.
Actually, we are a nation of (unrealistic) optimistic zealots. How
much did we think we should have scored? What could we say had we
been all out against Northern Ireland for fewer than 50 runs? Would
we not have said that at least sixty runs would have been better?
Well, now we have three runs more than that.
Frankly, I don't understand what the fuss is all about. What is wrong
in losing to another associate member of the ICC in hot, sultry
weather that the Irish have never experienced? What is wrong with
being terrified of a paceman who is not even related to Akram or
Srinath? What's so demeaning in being defeated in a cricket match
that is not even labelled 'first class'? Everything, if you ask an
optimist like me.
The pessimists, on the other hand, are content because their
foreboding omen was destined to materialise.
So we lost a cricket match. We have not been defeated in, say carom,
or bagaduli. I am not at all bothered about the defeat. I am
terrified of the aftermath. Forget about ex-cricketers and
ex-selectors and ex-BCB members and ex-cricket fans and ex-readers of
cricket news. They will always grumble and find faults.
What worries me, and to some extent I find annoying, is Bangladesh
manager Tanveer Haider's rash remarks after the Irish shame that the
cricketers he led to the Commonwealth Games are 'second class'. He
has done it for the second time. The first was after the disastrous
tour of Ireland, England and Scotland earlier when he along with some
other BCB officials outrageously castigated Coach Gordon Greenidge
and the fallen players publicly. And now after the Kuala jwala.
According to press reports, Mr. Haider thinks the cricketers he led
to Malaysia have 'no technique, it is not right to expect anything of
this team, they are not in a position to play cricket at this level,
they lack self-confidence'. Phew!
Being an ex-cricketer of some repute, did it take Mr. Haider a whole
trip to discover the drawbacks of his team? Being a BCB
vice-president he could have even advocated that these 'second class'
cricketers should not form part of his travel luggage. He is not even
willing to give credit to the bowlers. That performance against South
Africa was no mean feat.
But, does Mr. Haider only complain? Not necessarily. He takes credit
for Bidyut's innings of 70 to the extent that he had to do a lot of
hard work to that end. Manager's do not accompany a team for any
other purpose.
Occasionally we have heard our cricket manager cite three aspects of
cricket as our weak point - batting, bowling and fielding. That is
precisely the point. The manager shaheb is missing a vital point -
that of motivating his players to rise above themselves and do a
first class job. It has happened. Not to us, but to many other teams
in all sorts of games. Managers in winning countries do not play
games with their players.
Think of World Cup winning French manager Aime Jaquet. Recollect him
prancing in the arena designated just outside the sideline, recall
him huffing and puffing and yelling to his players of the calibre of
Blanc, Thuram and Zidane. Could they hear what he was saying? No!
But, when the corner of eye catches your manager pulling his hair
out, you can jump above the world and even manage to humiliate the
best. Zidane and his friends did just that.
If we lack technique, if we are not capable of playing front foot, if
we are incompetent in batting, fielding and bowling, then the only
thing that can make us win matches is team spirit. If anything, that
is what has been lacking in the Bangladesh team.
Comments of the nature spewed by Mr. Tanveer do nothing to bolster
team or individual moral. Quite the contrary.
Gazi Ashraf has been a long-time manager and Oh! My God! the coach to
Malaysia. Perhaps the best outcome of the Commonwealth debacle has
been his very bold and timely decision to disassociate from national
cricket. He is the first Bangladeshi to behave like a true gentleman.
We have had train accidents, disaster in the power sector, law and
order chaos, mess in the universities; but no minister, not even a
junior officer thought him responsible to resign. Gazi Ashraf will go
down (no pun intended) in history as having done a very honourable
thing although his failure as an administrator may balance the palla
Gazi Ashraf is a soft-spoken person. Too soft, some would say. He is
perhaps not the right type to imbue, inject, and infuse vitality into
a side that lacks everything, according to the admission of some BCB
officials. We need someone who can get out hundred percent from a
chap who is not capable of even giving ten percent. We need a manager
who can make first class players from second class material. After
all, a manager worth his salt does not only bask in the achievements
of his players. He takes responsibility when HIS players fail. He is
a good manager who realises HIS players failed because HE FAILED.
Only seven months remain to the World Cup in England. What is our aim
when we face the might of the game, not Northern Ireland! We want to
prove that we can give a fight, that we tried, that in ten years time
we could be a force to reckon with. We want to scare everyone out
there just a wee little bit. But, can we do that without someone who
can light fire in cricket's ashes? Someone who can make them look a
man-eating tiger in the eyes.
We need a manager, not a critic. Of the latter breed we have plenty,
including me.
Source :: The Bangladesh Daily Star (https://www.dailystarnews.com)