Colin Croft's Preview - West Indies v Bangladesh (21 May 1999)
Whatever happens, the West Indies cannot be sure of anything in this important but dangerous game
01-Jan-1970
21 May 1999
Colin Croft's Preview - West Indies v Bangladesh
Colin Croft
Whatever happens, the West Indies cannot be sure of anything in this
important but dangerous game. From most angles, the West Indies
should win this game very easily. However, complacency could be
dangerous, despite the fact that the West Indies easily has better
personnel. If you want to mention complacency, just ask the Indians,
who eventually lost to Zimbabwe. While I do not consider Zimbabwe as
one of the minion teams, they played a hell of a game to beat the
Indians, who, really, should have beaten Zimbabwe.
This game is all important to both West Indies and Bangladesh. Both
lost their opening fixture; Bangladesh easily to New Zealand and West
Indies almost as easily to Pakistan. Whichever of these two teams win
now, that team could still have a chance of qualifying for the Super
Sixes. Bangladesh still have to play against Scotland, Australia and
Pakistan after they play the West Indies. West Indies still have to
play New Zealand, Scotland and Australia. Any slip-ups now could be
very dangerous, especially for a senior team like the West Indies.
Gordon Greenidge, the former West Indian opening batsman who is now
Bangladesh's coach, has complained that his team "talks" a good game,
but when it comes down to business, they are not the same. Bangladesh
would have to change this if they are going to surprise the West
Indies.
The slow medium pace/quickish spin of New Zealand's Allott, Nash,
Cairns, Larsen and Harris seemed to confuse the Bangladesh batsmen who
seem not to be able to use their legs well in getting to the pitch of
the deliveries.
Though the West Indies have not named their team up to 18 hours before
the game, one could almost be assured that at least four fast bowlers
would be included. Either Ambrose or Walsh or even both would
probably rest. That would only leave Dillon, King and Bryan to
combine with perhaps Simmons, Adams and perhaps Perry. With Arthurton
absent with injury, the West Indies must fortify their bowling, which
looked decidedly short against the Pakistanis. Having said that, the
West Indian bowlers still managed to restrict the Pakistanis to 229-8
in 50 overs. That was not such a bad job, even though Pakistan were
42-4 at one stage.
It is the West Indies batting that would probably be on trial again.
Against Australia in the Caribbean last month, the batting held up
fairly well with Campbell providing good steel opening. and allowing
the batting to rotate around him.
Against Pakistan, Campbell failed against the great pace of Shoaib
Akhtar. Ridley Jacobs and Jimmy Adams stabilised things without
becoming dominant. Lara looked good without continuing. It was left
to Chanderpaul to try to make some attempt on Pakistan.
However, the tail was really poor. Between Simmons, Ambrose, the
injured Arthurton, Dillon and Walsh, they only managed 22 runs. That
is where the West Indies problems lay. Their later order batsmen have
got to make more runs, especially if one or two of the earlier batsmen
do not score well. The key to any West Indian success would simply be
to make huge scores.
The opening bowlers of Bangladesh are not so bad. Hasimul Hussein,
Mondural Islam and even Khalid Mahmud are bowlers who could strangle
batsmen out more than destroy them. The West Indies batsmen would
have to be very patient.
Overall, the West Indies should have the distinct advantage here.
However, the slowness of the Bangladesh bowlers is not to be
underestimated. It must also be remembered that already, minor upsets
have occurred with New Zealand beating Australia and Zimbabwe beating
India. There will be a major upset somewhere in this competition.
After the experience of Kenya in the last World Cup, the West Indies
would not want to go through that again. They should win, but caution
is the key.
Source :: Colin Croft