Mark Waugh uncertain whether to record his statement (27 December 1998)
KARACHI, Dec 26: Australian batsman Mark Waugh is undecided whether to record his statement with the judicial commission on Jan 8 in public or in camera, Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) legal advisor Ali Sibtain Fazli said on Saturday
27-Dec-1998
27 December 1998
Mark Waugh uncertain whether to record his statement
By Our Sports Reporter
KARACHI, Dec 26: Australian batsman Mark Waugh is undecided whether
to record his statement with the judicial commission on Jan 8 in
public or in camera, Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) legal advisor Ali
Sibtain Fazli said on Saturday.
"Mark Waugh, in the latest development, has agreed to appear before
the inquiry in Melbourne on Jan 8 but is still discussing the
possibilities with his solicitor," Fazli said from Lahore.
Earlier, Brian Ward, solicitor for the Australian Cricket Board
(ACB), in a facsimile communication to Fazli had said: "Our
instructions are that he is presently obtaining independent legal
advice in relation to his availability to give evidence and whether
he will seek to give that evidence in camera.
"While there is no reason to believe that Mark Waugh will not give
evidence, we are not able to confirm that is the case and will do as
soon as possible." However, Shane Warne is confirmed to give his
statement in public, Ward informed Fazli on Thursday.
Mark Waugh and Shane Warne were two of the three Australians (third
being Tim May) who had accused Salim Malik of offering them bribe in
the 1994-95 home series in Pakistan. Waugh had also appeared before
the judicial commission in October and had repeated the allegations
while looking right into the eyes of Salim Malik.
To recall, Waugh had given his October statement in public. But
earlier this week, the credibility of the players and their
accusations lost weight when they admitted that they took money from
an Indian bookmaker to provide weather and pitch reports shortly
before arriving in Pakistan in Sri Lanka. Besides Warne, Alan
Crompton will also be a witness. The details of the Jan 8 hearing
were also discussed/finalized by Brian Ward.
The venue of the hearing is scheduled at Court No 1 of the County
Court of Victoria. The Court is located at 55 King Street, Melbourne.
An accrediated court reporter will be hired by the Australian Cricket
Board (ACB) who will provide the judicial commission the formal
transcripts of the proceedings.
The inquiry will be open to the public. Although the designated court
is said to be equipped to accommodate members of the public, it is
likely that the demand will exceed the capacity of the courtroom. As
this tribunal will also be conducting some other civil matters at the
time, it has to be decided between Ward and Fazli arrangements for
public and media access to the inquiry which ensures neither the
inquiry nor the Victorian Civil and Administrative Appeals Tribunal
(VCAT) is disturbed.
Abdus Salam Khawar, Registrar of the Lahore High Court, will act as
convener of the inquiry and that Ali Sibtain Fazli will act as
Counsel assisting and will himself be assisted in that role.
Fazli said he had also recommended to the Australia to give Salim
Malik an opportunity to re-examine his accusers. "That suggestion has
been accepted. Either Malik of his counsel can cross-examine his
accusers but at their expense. "Mr Abdus Salam Khawar will be formaly
informing Salim Malik on Monday about the proposal," he said.
Fazli said Justice Malik Mohammad Qayyum has agreed in principle to
allow the accused examine his accuser (s). "He (Justice Malik
Mohammad Qayyum) will be fixing a date sometime next week."
Fazli said it was not necessary that all the witnesses will have to
be recalled. "We don't have to call everyone. For example, Wasim
Akram can be awarded the opportunity to cross-examine Ata-ur-Rahman
or Salim Malik and Mushtaq Ahmad can be allowed to question Salim
Pervaiz." But Fazli admitted that the judicial commission report was
unlikely to be submitted to President Rafiq Tarrar until the last
week of next month. "Justice Qayyum was given an extension till Dec
31 but now he will have to request for another one month extension.
"In any case, the report is unlikely to be finalized and submitted
before next month."
Source :: Dawn (https://dawn.com/)