23 March 1999
Beyond the boundary - Our cricket needs a shakeup
Shakil Kasem
As a nation we are well known for not looking too far beyond our
noses. In our social and national life, short term gains and interests
are the basic order of the day. For obvious reasons I shall not
venture to comment further, other than to mention that we are not
particularly averse to employing whatever means required to achieve
these goals. Implications of such an approach we then leave to the
future to judge. We regret at leisure.
In keeping with another of our widely acknowledged traits, which is
our inordinately high level of national innocence and naivete, we had
celebrated our "success" in achieving ODI status with elaborate pomp
and fanfare a couple of seasons ago. We have since then played
twenty-seven ODI's in which our solitary win must be viewed more as an
aberration that an achievement. We are now headed full tilt, all
systems go, towards achieving Test status. Our bark is also worse than
our bite.
Considering what was on display against Pakistan, Kenya and Zimbabwe
over the last week it is obvious that the meltdown of our playing
standards have been starkly evident, from the ordinary to the
pathetic. It is important for all and sundry to determine why there
has been such a decline in less than a year.
As far as the three matches were concerned, Pakistan were predictably
patronising in their approach and attitude. A batting line-up that
gifts wickets to bowlers the likes of Saeed Anwar & Co., who are at
best impostors of the art of any kind of bowling, does not really get
too many brownie points for credibility. The match therefore was a
foregone conclusion, the less said about it the better.
What is of concern however is the manner in which Bangladesh went down
to Kenya. Even as someone watching the match from the safe confines of
my home on TV, I was mesmerised by the savage ferocity of the Kenyan
storm that fairly ravaged the Bangladesh team on our very own home
ground. Bangladesh was outplayed and outgunned in every department of
the game, the difference in class there for all to see. There is no
shame in admitting that we were cut down to size by a team that knew
exactly what they were doing. We, on the other hand, were clueless.
Against Zimbabwe we had the same odds for survival as a snowball had
in hell. We have cultivated the art of giving away six-plus runs per
over when bowling, and scoring less than half of that whilst batting.
Not what you might call good business sense at this level of the game.
The only discomfort the Zimbabwean captain faced during the day, was
at the post match press conference. He had to come up with suitably
polite and diplomatically correct replies when asked what he thought
about his opponents.
Cricket lovers, fans of Bangladesh cricket, and the paying public are
now like jilted lovers, anguished, aggrieved and increasingly
frustrated at the turnaround of their team. The side is presently
meandering through the maze of international competitions in a manner
that can only charitably be termed purposeless. It does not seem to
have a plan of action, has no sense of direction, and is bereft of
confidence. Our team is like a random blip on the radar screen of
international cricket.
There is too much reliance placed on a non-existent team management,
whose commitment and credibility are quite obviously in short supply.
It is time now to ask some pertinent questions. Is the team in the
right hands? What exactly is the role of the coach of this side? Has
he given any time frame when this side is likely to show any results?
In this fiercely competitive and profit-oriented world, performances
count for everything. Nothing more, nothing less. There are countless
instances around the world of team management having to give way
because they have failed to deliver the goods. So why must we
overstress this concept of Eastern hospitality and polite wishy-washy
overtures?
If the present coach has any reservations and /or misgivings about the
role he has been asked to perform by the Board, then he should either
sort it out to his satisfaction or hand over charge to another
individual who would be willing to work under the existing set of
circumstances.
Meanwhile, the Bangladesh team has been repeating basic errors in
every department of the game. There is no evidence to suggest that
there is a game plan for any match. The players seem totally lost and
out of focus on the field. There is a crisis in leadership; somebody
is not doing a good job of providing the necessary motivation. The
coach has not, for once, come out, in print or otherwise, about the
direction this team is likely to take. If he chooses to sulk in
private, that is his prerogative, but the team should not suffer in
public as a result.
One has been given to understand umpteen times in the past, that the
present coach is also serving the Board as Director of Coaching. Why
should that position be the criterion for him to coach the national
team as well? This Directorate should be the focus of all coaching
activities, planning and training of all possible and potential
players who will perhaps one day be good enough to play representative
cricket. The Director's function should be to evolve, implement and
oversee that a particular system is operating effectively to that end.
And here the line should be drawn. How the 15 or so players chosen by
the national selectors should perform as a team at the topmost level
should be a job given to a specialist. This individual must be
result-oriented and have an established track record in this
particular role at the international level.
Bangladeshis have achieved most things in life the hard way. Why
should our cricketers by any different? Their road to success should
be hard and rocky but it must be the right one. With no short cuts,
and with a guide who is knowledgeable about the terrain and knows
where he is going and when he might get there.
Let's find such a man. Quickly. We have a bridge to cross and a bus to
catch.
Source :: The Bangladesh Daily Star (https://www.dailystarnews.com)