MELBOURNE - The Australian Cricket Board's lawyers will meet with Mark
Waugh's legal team today to try and convince him to give evidence into an
investigation probing corruption in the game.
ACB chief Malcolm Speed said the board would also be seeking clarification
whether it could force Waugh to give evidence to an anti-corruption unit.
"We have the power under the contract that compels Mark to follow reasonable
directions from the ACB," Speed said.
Waugh's international career is again under a cloud after, on legal advice,
he refused to be interviewed by anti-corruption investigator Greg Melick.
The ICC is investigating allegations he accepted more money than was
previously disclosed from illegal Indian bookmaker MK Gupta in return for
Australian team information.
Melick and the ICC unit, headed by chief investigator Sir Paul Condon,
wanted to speak to Waugh here next month after an Indian police report
alleged he had taken $US20,000 ($A36,000) from Gupta.
"We're not quite sure why he's unwilling to submit to this interview at this
stage so I think there needs to be some dialogue there and over the next
couple of days we'll try and sort it out," Speed told radio station 3AW.
Asked whether Waugh would be stood down for the rest of the season, Speed
said it would be a matter for the ACB board of directors to consider.
"There are unsubstantiated allegations that have been made against Mark
Waugh and until there's something further than that, the ACB doesn't see it
as appropriate to take further action.
"Whether his refusal to answer questions changes that position - that's an
issue we'll have to resolve over the next few days."
Waugh, who denied the allegations at a press conference but has not made an
official statement to the ACB, appeared to be testing the will of the ACB
which will want the matter resolved before the Australian team leaves for
India in mid-February.
The ICC has made it clear that the next step will have to come from the ACB
and the board would have to determine what action it would take.
"To some extent we are caught in the middle here in that the allegation is
made and the ICC wants an investigation," Speed said.
"He's one of our players and it's important that we have a good relationship
with Mark and with all the players, but it is also important that the public
can see that we are dealing with it effectively."
The only public forum in which Waugh has addressed the latest allegations
was in an impromptu media conference on Queensland's Sunshine Coast last
year.
He said then he had already participated in the two inquiries conducted in
Australia and Pakistan.
In 1998, it was revealed that Waugh and Shane Warne admitted taking money
from a bookmaker called "John" in return for pitch and weather information
in 1994.
Meanwhile, an ICC spokesman also said that while no assumption of guilt on
Waugh's part could be made, it was hard to deny that his back-flip on being
interviewed would create a cloud of suspicion in the minds of the cricketing
public.
"It's disappointing news that any player is refusing to cooperate," an ICC
spokesman said in a telephone interview.
He pointed out that Waugh had at least stipulated that he was refusing
"presently" to undergo further interviews.
"It's coy, but it does leave the door open for future interviews," the
spokesman said.
Asked, however, if the decision would create suspicion over Waugh in the
eyes of the public, the spokesman said it was "difficult to disagree".
"As far as we are aware he has nothing to hide, but it doesn't do him any
favours taking this decision," the spokesman said.