Berry S: On David Richards - Chief Exec. ICC (16Jul1993)
Smoke from the clocktower (Thanks::Sunday Telegraph) Scyld Berry on David Richards, the man given the job of initiating cricket's new world order On Thursday week cricket makes an attempt at a new world order when the first chief
16-Jul-1993
Smoke from the clocktower (Thanks::Sunday Telegraph)
Scyld Berry on David Richards, the man given the job of
initiating cricket's new world order
On Thursday week cricket makes an attempt at a new
world order when the first chief executive of the
International Cricket Council takes up his post under the
clocktower at Lord's where the groundstaff used to be.
Deservedly, David Richards will be paid to front an
organisation which at times has made the TCCB seem popular
and responsive. The circumstances of the appointment of
Richards were almost papal. The ICC supremo could not be
English, just as the present Pope could not be Italian,
because a complete change from the traditional order was
required. On the other hand, just as a Third World Pope
would have been too radical a departure for some, so the
first executive could not come from the West Indies or
Asia. An Australian it had to be, and in Australia there
was only one cricket administrator sufficiently able and
efficient to be a career diplomat. Richards could be
forgiven for thinking that he has been shaped by destiny
for this newly-created job. On joining the Victorian Cricket
Association in 1972, after graduating from university in
his native Melbourne, he spent his first day sitting beside
Sir Donald Bradman and watching the second half of Garfield
Sobers' innings of 254. Not a bad job, he thought. On
moving to the Australian Cricket Board in 1980, Richards had
to resolve the conflicts generated by World Series Cricket -
"Hindsight will tell you it was good for the game" - and
by the Kim Hughes-led rebel tours of South Africa before
Australian cricket could regain its former strength.
He can justly say, on leaving Australian cricket: "I can
walk away with no concerns about the future." Richards will
not give media interviews before taking up his appointment,
so it was an illuminating exposition when he spoke last
Tuesday at a conference at Australia House on the future of
ICC. He cited one formative moment when he attended a
cricket dinner in Sharjah - having been so insular in his
early career that he did not know where the place was -
and listened to a typical cricket speech with his back to
the top table. When he turned round, he saw the speaker was
an Arab in white robes and realised: "Cricket is becoming
internationalised." The greatest criticism to be made of
the ICC in its old lethargic inefficiency was that it did
little to make the game international. Here Richards has
his greatest ambitions: "If I look in my crystal ball for
the next 10 to 20 years, I can see five new countries
playing one- day cricket competitively and developing a
cricket culture, starting with Bangladesh. Then they may
go on to play Test cricket one day." Satellite TV,
especially the Star network in Asia, "will be the great new
evangelist for the game". It is a startingly
internationalist statement when he says: "The future of the
game lies with the Associate Members of ICC more than
the Full Members." To this end he welcomes the change
which will see three Associates go through from the
qualifying tournament in Kenya next February to the World
Cup in India, Pakistan and Sri Lanka. He defends the
@100,000 handouts to them but implies he will be wanting
more accountability. Richards is pleased to note a worldwide
improvement in behaviour, not least in grade cricket in
Melbourne where he once captained Ashwood. "In the last two
or three years we have been seeing a reassertion of the
basic values." For this he gives credit to the ICC Code of
Conduct, when it might be more a natural swinging back of
the pendulum. The opening test for Richards comes at the
ICC meeting next month when constitutional changes have
to be agreed. As an Australian, he might have been
suspected of wanting to preserve the veto for the Founder
Members, England and Australia, but he thinks it will be
abolished if "a few quid pro quos" are accepted.
"Countries like Pakistan and the West Indies have become
equal or better on the field and have to be treated as such
administratively. "If he can succeed in initiating a new
world order in cricket, he could become a papal candidate as
well.
posted by Vicky on r.s.c.