Zimbabwe Cricket Online- editorial
The ninth issue of this magazine comes out as the Zimbabwe team begin their programme in the triangular tournament in South Africa, which also involves England
John Ward
21-Jan-2000
The ninth issue of this magazine comes out as the Zimbabwe team
begin their programme in the triangular tournament in South Africa,
which also involves England. Zimbabwe's prospects were previewed in
our last issue.
South Africa are obviously strong favourites to win the
tournament, as they would be against any other country in the world
except Australia. They rarely have a bad day, and it is their
consistency as much as anything else that is their strength.
Zimbabwe and England, in contrast, are both unpredictable. In the
recent five-Test series between South Africa and England, England
lost convincingly the two Tests in which they played badly, but held
their own in the others. Zimbabwe this season have unfortunately
been more predictable than usual, being usually defeated. The team
is probably under pressure right now as all their supports wait to
see whether they really have maintained the improvement shown at the
end of the Sri Lankan tour.
On recent form, England have had more good days than Zimbabwe
and will expect to be finalists with South Africa. In the next month
there will be no fewer than seven one-day internationals between
Zimbabwe and England, which could radically alter the 5-2 advantage
Zimbabwe hold in the seven matches the two countries have played so
far over the past eight years. Zimbabwe will want to hold on to that
advantage, while England will be desperate to put things right, from
their point of view. The cricket will be very competitive, and
Zimbabwe will expect to have the South African crowds supporting
them, as they did in their last triangular tournament there three
years ago.
Self-confidence, according to Ravi Shastri and others, is the
key to Zimbabwe's success, especially in a tight situation.
Zimbabwean society is such, though, that genuine self-confidence, of
the right kind, is somewhat rare. The success of the Australians is
due in no small measure to their brash self-confidence, as was clear
in the World Cup when they twice beat South Africa in vital matches,
holding their nerve while South Africa cracked. Zimbabweans, as a
rule, tend to allow too many negative, defeatist thoughts into their
cricket, and other areas of life as well. Cricket is a psychological
battle, played in the mind, as has been said often enough before.
The English too tend to lack self-confidence at times,
especially in recent years. South African cricket before Eddie
Barlow suffered from the same problem, but since then they have
scarcely looked back, although they have not yet reached the same
level as the Australians. Self-confidence can become arrogance,
however, as several leading West Indians will testify has happened to
their Test team and been responsible for their spectacular crash from
the heights.
Self-confidence cannot be mastered quickly, and it does not
help when the public are quick to deride the failures of the national
side, as happens very readily in both Zimbabwe and England. Perhaps
it is better simply to ignore defeat and virtually pretend it didn't
happen, as the Australians tend to do. Dwelling on defeat leads to
expectations of further defeats, by players and public alike.
Zimbabweans at times cannot seem to get over the fact that they live
in a small country with a small population base, which leads to
unjustified feelings of inferiority when facing major opponents. On
the other hand, when the team loses to these opponents, many
supporters condemn the team for supposed lack of quality. The truth
is that we have a remarkably capable side considering our small
resources, and can at times defeat the best in the world, as was
shown against South Africa in the World Cup.
That World Cup victory should have been a watershed, an
inspiration to the team that would have enabled it to play with
enough self-confidence to win matches and series more regularly.
Instead, unaccountably, the team has never played remotely as well
again. Even before facing Australia and South Africa indifficult
conditions, they played well below their potential in the Super Six
and the tournaments in Singapore and Kenya. There has been much
speculation as to the reasons for this, but no definitive answers.
The fact just remains that confidence is the key, and when our
players are thinking sufficiently positively, when they have
convinced themselves that they are good enough to beat anybody, that
is when they will start doing it.
Last time they visited South Africa, Zimbabwe more than once
gave the hosts 'a hell of a fright', but were beaten in the end each
time after a hard tussle. There was enough confidence to do well,
but not enough to win. Realistically, after recent experiences, that
is perhaps the best we can hope for, maybe even against England, this
time. Doing consistently well, fighting consistently hard, can
eventually be a platform for more tangible success.
Andy Flower's views on the Sri Lankans, published here in issue
3, were popular among our readers, so in this issue we include his
views on playing South Africa. In our next issue he will discuss
England. Andy is one player who has his mind right and has an
adequate estimation of his own ability, in any situation and against
any opponent. The oldest regular player in the side, he expects to
be around for some time yet. He may not have the personal charisma
of Eddie Barlow, which is rare indeed, but his total professionalism
and quiet self-confidence make him the ideal role model, and not only
for the young.
Our other player interview is with pace bowler Dan Rowett, who
played for the national side as long as 1993 but, due largely to
circumstances beyond his control, has yet to play full international
cricket. He still hopes to, quite realistically. He has been
turning in good club performances this season, although he will not
play again before April, and this was what prompted us to find out
more about the man.