The ODI batting giants: part 1

At the outset let me apologise to all the readers for my inability to read and respond to the comments sent for my previous article. Even though the reasons were beyond my control, it is my corner of "the Cordon" and it was my responsibility to keep this small area working, accessible and free of trash. My thanks to Cricinfo technical team for addressing this sticky problem and I will have access to the comments for my articles, which will henceforth be published, interjected with my responses.

The year 2012 witnessed retirement of the two giants of ODI format. Two pillars of the game, neither of whom could ever be denied a place among the top four of the ODI game. They scored tons of runs and scored these in a magnificent manner, scored these when their team needed them and pulverised top-quality attacks. Sachin Tendulkar and Ricky Ponting played like kings and retired in style. Towards the end of the year another player retired from Test cricket, in the opinion of many, when he was still at the top. Unfortunately this also meant an exclusion from a farewell ODI series. However, this cannot deny the stellar contributions Michael Hussey made towards his team's successes. The retirement of these three giants has prompted me to do a very exhaustive analysis of the ODI batting giants. This is a two-part article due to the number of areas covered. At the end of this article I have outlined the second article so that reader requests can be incorporated wherever possible.

How many batsmen do I include in this analysis and how do I decide on the specific batsmen? A very difficult task indeed. I have used a combination of numbers, the team achievements, their contributions to the ODI format in general and their team in particular. I have tried to ensure as wide a representation across countries and as broad-based representation across the years as possible. Over the past 40 odd years, 10 World Cups and 6 Champions Trophy tournaments have been held. Australia has won 6, West Indies 3, India 2.5, Sri Lanka 1.5 and Pakistan, South Africa and New Zealand, one each. The selection of players reflects, to some extent, this level of success of their teams.

Taking all above into consideration, I have selected following 15 batsmen, listed in chronological order. There may be minor disagreements among readers but there is no denying that these 15 represent the very cream of ODI batting. They have contributed over 130,000 runs, just short of 10% of the total runs scored in ODI matches. Most of these batsmen select themselves.

Richards      1975 1991
Miandad       1975 1996
M Crowe       1982 1995
M Waugh       1988 2002
Tendulkar     1989 2012
Jayasuriya    1989 2011
Lara          1990 2007
Inzamam       1991 2007
A Flower      1992 2003
Bevan         1994 2004
Ponting       1995 2012
Kallis        1996 2012 Active
Gilchrist     1996 2008
Pietersen     2004 2013 Active
Dhoni         2004 2013 Active

I included Hussey in the beginning but towards the end felt that Mark Waugh could not be ignored. Since both are among my favourite batsmen, it was a wrench to exclude either of them. Martin Crowe played in tough times and just about edged out Fleming. Jayasuriya transformed the game itself. Miandad and Inzamam selected themselves. So did Richards and Lara. The Tendulkar lily need not be gilded. Dhoni's finishing exploits are legendary giving him the edge ahead of Ganguly. Pietersen and Andy Flower are, by far, their respective country's best batsmen.

My sincere apologies to Lloyd, Gayle, Haynes, Dean Jones, Hussey, Saeed Anwar, Mohammad Yousuf, de Silva, Sangakkara, Jayawardene, Ganguly, Azharuddin, Sehwag, Graeme Smith, Gibbs, Fleming et al, and their supporters. Any of them would have graced this list with distinction. Shakib Al Hasan will certainly qualify into an allrounder's list but has not done enough in batting.

In view of the number of tables and the huge amount of information, I have decided to do this mammoth analysis in two parts. The first part is based on available data and I would venture to say that most of this data could be extracted using statsguru. However, here it is available in a single place in easily understandable tables for the crème de la crème of ODI batsmen. The second part will be slightly different where I have done a lot of extraction and grouping for those tables. Many of the ideas in the second part are unique and will not be available anywhere. Readers would also have the opportunity to suggest any new tables which could be developed. I would be glad to create these if I can.

Here is one important factor about the presentation of these tables. I have decided not to order the tables on any data field. It will invite unnecessary discussions. These are all great players and this exercise is not to determine who the best is. Hence all tables will be presented in strictly chronological order. The highlighting would be done in the commentary after the tables.

1. Career Summary

Batsman	Inngs	NOs	Runs	Balls	Avge	S/R	RpI	Index
Richards	167	24	6721	7581	47.00	88.7	40.2	35.7
Miandad	218	41	7381	10979	41.70	67.2	33.9	22.8
M Crowe	141	19	4704	6464	38.56	72.8	33.4	24.3
M Waugh	236	20	8500	11063	39.35	76.8	36.0	27.7
Tendulkar	452	41	18426	21371	44.83	86.2	40.8	35.1
Jayasuriya	433	18	13430	14736	32.36	91.1	31.0	28.3
Lara	289	32	10406	13056	40.49	79.7	36.0	28.7
Inzamam	350	53	11739	15827	39.53	74.2	33.5	24.9
Flower	208	16	6785	9144	35.34	74.2	32.6	24.2
Bevan	196	67	6914	9299	53.60	74.4	35.3	26.2
Ponting	365	39	13703	17067	42.03	80.3	37.5	30.1
Kallis	307	53	11499	15756	45.27	73.0	37.5	27.3
Gilchrist	279	11	9619	9923	35.89	96.9	34.5	33.4
Pietersen	121	16	4369	5035	41.61	86.8	36.1	31.3
Dhoni	196	56	7259	8228	51.85	88.2	37.0	32.7

These are numbers which any cricket aficionado would reel off if woken up at 3am. The key columns here are RpI and the Index. The Batting average in ODIs is far more skewed than in Test matches because of the limited number of overs, non-completion of innings and high percentage of not-outs. The number of not-outs varies between 67 for the middle-order stalwart like Bevan to 18 for an attacking opener like Jayasuriya. Hence RpI (Runs per Innings) is a very important measure and reflects the relative positioning of batsmen far more accurately. Hence almost all these tables will have both Average and RpI.

Now for the Index. This has been a favourite combination measure of mine over the past 15 years. Realizing the importance of Average/RpI and the Strike Rate, I had multiplied the two measures, thus giving them equal importance. It allows players to compensate shortcomings in one measure with higher level performances in the other. Earlier I used this Index based on Batting average but now I always use RpI in all Index calculations.

The batting averages which stand out are Richards' 47.00, Bevan's 53.60 and Dhoni's 51.85. Jayasuriya's 90+ strike rate and the near-90 strike rate of Richards at 88.7 and Dhoni at 88.2 stand out. The 35+ Index values of Richards and Tendulkar sets them apart. Readers can note how Jayasuriya's low RpI value is partly compensated by the high strike rate. Similarly Kallis' average strike rate is offset by a good RpI value. The Index represents a clear value to the team: non-contextual of course.

2. Opening runs

Batsman	Inns	NOs	Runs	Balls	Avge	S/R	RpI	Index	OPP Runs	OPP Avge
Richards	0	0	0	0	0.00	0.0	0.0	0.0	0	0.0
J Miandad	4	0	85	86	21.25	98.8	21.2	21.0	102	25.5
Crowe	22	1	814	1173	38.76	69.4	37.0	25.7	1008	45.8
M Waugh	141	11	5729	7473	44.07	76.7	40.6	31.1	5959	42.3
Tendulkar	340	23	15310	17397	48.30	88.0	45.0	39.6	14154	41.6
Jayasuriya	383	15	12740	13788	34.62	92.4	33.3	30.7	12871	33.6
Lara	52	5	2166	2871	46.09	75.4	41.7	31.4	1597	30.7
Inzamam	12	0	516	722	43.00	71.5	43.0	30.7	493	41.1
Flower	44	2	1352	1928	32.19	70.1	30.7	21.5	1676	38.1
Bevan	1	1	40	62	0.00	64.5	40.0	25.8	17	17.0
Ponting	6	1	272	350	54.40	77.7	45.3	35.2	295	49.2
Kallis	7	0	135	206	19.29	65.5	19.3	12.6	243	34.7
Gilchrist	259	7	9200	9386	36.51	98.0	35.5	34.8	11092	42.8
Pietersen	8	1	412	469	58.86	87.8	51.5	45.2	563	70.4
Dhoni	2	0	98	113	49.00	86.7	49.0	42.5	21	10.5

The opening position in ODIs has undergone sea-changes across the years. Steady opening partnerships with both batsmen striking at around 60, with the objective of scoring a match-winning 250, were the order of the day around the 1980s. Mark Greatbatch was the first of the attacking openers who set the 1992 World Cup alight. This was followed by the Sri Lankan blitz with both openers, Jayasuriya and Kaluwitharana, blazing away, in the next edition. They won a World Cup with these attacking methods although the final two matches were won by conventional batsmen. Over the next 15 years the opening batting has changed in accordance with rule changes and power play implementations. Today it would be difficult to find a Greenidge-Haynes combination opening, both striking at below 65. This is a specialist position and various top batsmen have occupied it, with telling effect. Hence a special view of this anchor position is necessary.

The table contents are standard for most of these analyses. Richards never opened, Miandad once in three years and Martin Crowe, very rarely. Many of the others like Mark Waugh, Tendulkar, Jayasuriya and Gilchrist, spent most of their careers opening the batting. Mark Waugh, less than the other three. Gilchrist was the true opening-zone batsman, striking at 98. Jayasuriya was nearly as good, at 92 and Tendulkar did his scoring at 88. Mark Waugh was more sedate, probably content with watching Gilchrist's striking at the other end. Still a respectable 77. Tendulkar's RpI of 45 is mind-blowing. This also means that he has the highest Index value of nearly 40. It can be seen that all the four had Index values exceeding 30. Lara's opening stints were more effective than the rest of his batting efforts. Andy Flower, on the other hand, was less successful opening the batting.

I have also determined the average opening partnerships when the concerned batsman opened: mostly with some other batsman, other than Mark Waugh and Gilchrist who opened the innings regularly together. Gilchrist leads this quartet for an average opening partnership of 45.8 and is closely followed by Mark Waugh, with 45.3: a testament to the fact that they opened together often. Tendulkar, often with Ganguly, and the rest of the time with different batsmen, averages 41.6. Jayasuriya's average is only 33.6, a reflection of the fact that he and his partner were in attacking mood almost throughout their partnerships.

3. Late order runs (6 onwards)

Batsman	Inns	NOs	Runs	Balls	Avge	S/R	RpI	Index	TeamRuns	BatRuns %
Richards	6	2	80	100	20.00	80.0	13.3	10.7	691	11.6
Miandad	9	1	175	267	21.88	65.5	19.4	12.7	400	43.8
M Crowe	3	1	138	176	69.00	78.4	46.0	36.1	507	27.2
M Waugh	4	2	51	60	25.50	85.0	12.8	10.8	153	33.3
Tendulkar	5	1	168	135	42.00	124.4	33.6	41.8	207	81.2
Jayasuriya	31	2	405	550	13.97	73.6	13.1	9.6	1720	23.5
Lara	8	3	263	274	52.60	96.0	32.9	31.6	515	51.1
Inzamam	25	3	542	754	24.64	71.9	21.7	15.6	1762	30.8
Flower	8	3	197	297	39.40	66.3	24.6	16.3	689	28.6
Bevan	106	45	3350	4286	54.92	78.2	31.6	24.7	8243	40.6
Ponting	6	3	75	90	25.00	83.3	12.5	10.4	424	17.7
Kallis	7	0	120	220	17.14	54.5	17.1	9.4	494	24.3
Gilchrist	19	4	390	493	26.00	79.1	20.5	16.2	1214	32.1
Pietersen	5	1	128	125	32.00	102.4	25.6	26.2	498	25.7
Dhoni	113	34	3375	4032	42.72	83.7	29.9	25.0	9479	35.6

Just as opening the batting is important, finishing an innings, whether setting a target or chasing is important. Unfortunately in this analysis the required data, which is the information on when a batsman was dismissed, is available only over the past 20 years, for two-thirds of the matches. So I have to take a view based on when the batsman entered to start his innings. So this may not be a complete analysis. But we can draw a few insights. For this analysis I have compiled the runs scored where a batsman came in at no.5/6 or afterwards. At no.6, only two of these batsmen, viz., Bevan and Dhoni have played enough innings and that is the reason why I have considered that the role of a finisher can be at No.5 or No.6. Those at 1 and 2 are openers, 3/4/5 are consolidators and 5/6 onwards are finishers. I know this is not perfect but it cannot be helped.

Examining the table reveals that only two batsmen have played enough innings at No.6 onwards. Bevan has played 106 very effective innings at an RpI of 31.6 and Index of 24.7. Dhoni has also excelled in this position with 113 innings at 29.9 and Index of 25.0. It should be noted that the RpI will necessarily be lower since these two batsmen have remained not out 45 and 34 times respectively. These values are very important for the team since these are scored at the end of the innings in crunch situations, whether the team was batting first or second.

Here I have looked for a different type of additional analysis. I compiled the sum of the runs added by the team after the entry of the concerned batsman and looked at what % was scored by the concerned batsman. I think I struck pay dirt since Bevan's 40.6% of all the runs scored by the team after his entry is a testament to the great impact on the Australian batting. Inclusive of Bevan's own failures this figure of 40+% is the essence of finishing a match. Dhoni is slightly below, at 35.6% possibly because he often had top-order batsmen batting with him.

4. Late-order runs (5 onwards)

Batsman	Inns	NOs	Runs	Balls	Avge	S/R	RpI	Index	TeamRuns	BatRuns %
Richards	35	3	930	1097	29.06	84.8	26.6	22.5	2828	32.9
Miandad	36	6	887	1321	29.57	67.1	24.6	16.5	3062	29.0
M Crowe	8	3	219	296	43.80	74.0	27.4	20.3	1257	17.4
M Waugh	41	5	985	1190	27.36	82.8	24.0	19.9	2813	35.0
Tendulkar	41	9	965	1118	30.16	86.3	23.5	20.3	3097	31.2
Jayasuriya	38	2	438	622	12.17	70.4	11.5	8.1	2184	20.1
Lara	47	9	1277	1665	33.61	76.7	27.2	20.8	4074	31.3
Inzamam	130	25	4015	5313	38.24	75.6	30.9	23.3	12820	31.3
Flower	56	7	1658	2384	33.84	69.5	29.6	20.6	4787	34.6
Bevan	139	50	4515	5848	50.73	77.2	32.5	25.1	11117	40.6
Ponting	12	4	124	164	15.50	75.6	10.3	7.8	1135	10.9
Kallis	30	6	950	1374	39.58	69.1	31.7	21.9	3563	26.7
Gilchrist	19	4	390	493	26.00	79.1	20.5	16.2	1214	32.1
Pietersen	17	7	826	830	82.60	99.5	48.6	48.4	1816	45.5
Dhoni	160	47	5258	6239	46.53	84.3	32.9	27.7	13831	38.0

This is a slight variation to the previous table. I have looked at batting efforts from No.5 onwards. A lot more batting efforts now find a place. Bevan improves slightly while Dhoni has a significant move upwards. Inzamam is the other batsman who has played many important innings at No.5 onwards. His Index value is a reasonable 23.3. Note how badly Jayasuriya and Ponting performed on the few occasions when they were moved out of their comfort zones of opening and No.3 respectively.

Bevan remains at 40.6% in the % team runs measure. Dhoni's figure improves to 38.0%. The new serious entrant to this table, Inzamam scored 34.6% of his team runs.

5. Against Best Team (based on runs scored)

Batsman	Team	Inns	NOs	Runs	Balls	Avge	S/R	RpI	Index
Richards	Aus	50	7	2187	2582	50.86	84.7	43.7	37.0
Miandad	Win	64	7	1930	3005	33.86	64.2	30.2	19.4
M Crowe	Aus	34	3	1096	1581	35.35	69.3	32.2	22.3
M Waugh	Win	45	2	1708	2227	39.72	76.7	38.0	29.1
Tendulkar	Slk	80	9	3113	3558	43.85	87.5	38.9	34.0
Jayasuriya	Ind	85	5	2899	2989	36.24	97.0	34.1	33.1
Lara	Aus	50	3	1858	2429	39.53	76.5	37.2	28.4
Inzamam	Ind	64	9	2403	3060	43.69	78.5	37.5	29.5
Flower	Ind	35	3	1297	1724	40.53	75.2	37.1	27.9
Bevan	Saf	31	5	1163	1490	44.73	78.1	37.5	29.3
Ponting	Ind	59	5	2164	2658	40.07	81.4	36.7	29.9
Kallis	Win	40	7	1666	2144	50.48	77.7	41.6	32.4
Gilchrist	Ind	45	1	1622	1634	36.86	99.3	36.0	35.8
Pietersen	Ind	28	3	1138	1323	45.52	86.0	40.6	35.0
Dhoni	Slk	45	11	2041	2252	60.03	90.6	45.4	41.1

Who were the favourite opponents of these wonderful batsmen? I have gone on runs scored rather than an average since scoring 2000 at 40 is more significant than scoring 500 at 50. The table is self-explanatory. The numbers which stand out are Dhoni's outstanding Index value of 41 against Sri Lanka, Richards' 37 against Australia and Gilchrist's 35+ against India. Tendulkar's 3000+ runs against Sri Lanka is the only instance of a batsman scoring over 3000 runs against a single country. I must confess that this is an educated guess and I will be glad to be disproved.

6. Best Year (based on runs scored)

Batsman	Year	Inns	NOs	Runs	Balls	Avge	S/R	RpI	Index
Richards	1985	25	5	1231	1332	61.55	92.4	49.2	45.5
J Miandad	1987	22	6	1084	1542	67.75	70.3	49.3	34.6
Crowe	1990	20	1	810	1177	42.63	68.8	40.5	27.9
M Waugh	1999	36	3	1468	1942	44.48	75.6	40.8	30.8
Tendulkar	1998	33	4	1894	1854	65.31	102.2	57.4	58.6
Jayasuriya	2001	33	1	1202	1444	37.56	83.2	36.4	30.3
Lara	1993	30	3	1349	1857	49.96	72.6	45.0	32.7
Inzamam	1999	28	4	1106	1571	46.08	70.4	39.5	27.8
Flower	2001	33	3	1060	1301	35.33	81.5	32.1	26.2
Bevan	1998	22	8	959	1174	68.50	81.7	43.6	35.6
Ponting	2007	24	6	1424	1553	79.11	91.7	59.3	54.4
Kallis	2000	38	9	1300	1952	44.83	66.6	34.2	22.8
Gilchrist	1999	37	0	1241	1393	33.54	89.1	33.5	29.9
Pietersen	2007	25	4	889	1130	42.33	78.7	35.6	28.0
Dhoni	2009	24	7	1198	1400	70.47	85.6	49.9	42.7

Measuring performance over a year is a good analysis since the year is a sufficiently long time to give due respect to high level of performances. It is possible that during the 1980s a player might have only played 20 matches while a player might have played 30 matches during the 2000s. However since this table uses runs scored as a basis the lean years do not figure in the same.

Tendulkar's 1998 must rank among the greatest achievement by a player across formats. Even though he played only 33 matches, he aggregated 1894 runs at better than run-a-ball. The Index value of 58 is certainly Bradmanesque. Ponting's 2007 performance, the year during which Australia won the World Cup, is second to Tendulkar's and the Index value of 54 defies description. Richards, during 1985, suffers only in comparison with these two giants. It is nice to note that, arguably the best three ODI batsmen of all time, feature in the top positions in this table.

7. Best/Worst streaks: of 15 matches

Batsman	Best Streak							Worst Streak
	StODI	Year	Runs	Balls	RpI	S/R	Index	StODI	Year	Runs	Balls	RpI	S/R	Index
Richards	1984	0253	994	1081	66.27	92.0	60.9	1988	0485	291	374	19.40	77.8	15.1
J Miandad	1987	0417	906	1253	60.40	72.3	43.7	1977	0041	250	416	16.67	60.1	10.0
Crowe	1992	0734	725	882	48.33	82.2	39.7	1985	0305	337	507	22.47	66.5	14.9
M Waugh	2000	1620	846	1015	56.40	83.3	47.0	1989	0549	271	346	18.07	78.3	14.2
Tendulkar	1998	1323	1105	1104	73.67	100.1	73.7	1993	0795	209	309	13.93	67.6	9.4
Jayasuriya	1997	1207	922	745	61.47	123.8	76.1	1990	0623	112	163	7.47	68.7	5.1
Lara	1994	0947	934	982	62.27	95.1	59.2	1998	1364	258	357	17.20	72.3	12.4
Inzamam	2000	1580	744	1035	49.60	71.9	35.7	1996	1095	251	394	16.73	63.7	10.7
Flower	2002	1814	719	854	47.93	84.2	40.4	1995	0982	248	380	16.53	65.3	10.8
Bevan	1998	1300	740	929	49.33	79.7	39.3	2002	1802	309	434	20.60	71.2	14.7
Ponting	2007	2473	925	1008	61.67	91.8	56.6	2008	2687	342	452	22.80	75.7	17.3
Kallis	2003	2029	893	1097	59.53	81.4	48.5	2005	2244	315	555	21.00	56.8	11.9
Gilchrist	2003	2052	860	746	57.33	115.3	66.1	2006	2434	306	342	20.40	89.5	18.3
Pietersen	2004	2193	786	790	52.40	99.5	52.1	2009	2827	268	352	17.87	76.1	13.6
Dhoni	2009	2815	773	858	51.53	90.1	46.4	2010	3030	311	501	20.73	62.1	12.9

This is an analysis based on 15 consecutive matches. 15 represents about 4-6 months of cricket and is a very clear indication of short-term form. And I have not even bothered with not-outs and average for this short period since three not-outs out of 15 will distort the figures considerably. So it is only RpI and Index based on RpI.

Tendulkar during 1998 features again. A golden run, rather platinum run, starting on 20 April, 1998 and ending on 28 October, 1998 produced an unforgettable sequence of 38, 143, 134, 33, 18, 100*, 65, 53, 17, 128*, 77, 127*, 29, 2 and 141: 1105 runs in 15 innings at a strike rate of almost exactly 100. The first two centuries were those famous Sharjah blitzes against Australia. Richards' golden run is equally noteworthy considering the run-scarcity during the 1980s. He scored 67, 189*(!!!), 3, 84*, 47, 98, 49, 103*, 30, 74, 51, 46, 68, 9 and 76. A total of 994 runs off 1081 balls, striking at 92. The 189, considered by many as the greatest ODI innings ever played, is the jewel in this crown. Ponting's sequence only suffers by comparison. His 2007 sequence was 82*, 10, 5, 51*, 111, 104, 75, 7, 113, 23, 91, 35, 86, 66* and 66. The aggregate was 925 runs at a strike rate exceeding 90. The later part of this golden run was during the 2007 World Cup.

Jayasuriya's worst streak during 1990, a run of 4, 1. 23, 5, 0, 4, 1, 26, 0, 0, 5, 3, 32, 5, 3 is something to behold. A mere 112 runs in 15 innings. Let me also add that he compiled 271 runs in 30 innings during this disastrous period. The next lowest is Tendulkar during the barren period of 1993. Note the consistency of Ponting. Even during his worst streak period, he aggregated 342 runs. Martin Crowe, against better bowlers, was nearly as consistent, aggregating 337 runs. Dhoni is in a surprise third position with 315 runs.

It is interesting to note that three other batsmen have exceeded 1000 runs in 15 innings. Hayden, with 1101 runs off 1108 balls during 2007, Amla, with 1083 runs off 1070 balls during 2009-10 and Kohli, with 1003 runs off 1054 balls during 2012. There are three instances of competent batsmen scoring below 112 runs in a 15-innings streak. Samuels had a nightmare run of 90 runs in 15 innings during 2006, Pollock compiled only 105 runs during 2002 and Boucher scored 109 runs during 1999. It may seem obvious but it is clear that when a batsman is in great form he scores much faster than when he is in miserable form.

A shot-in-the-dark measure, not based on any scientific reasoning, is the difference between the best 15-innings RpI and worst 15-innings RpI figures. Tendulkar leads in this measure with a difference of around 60, followed by Jayasuriya, with a near-55 figure. Richards has a value of around 46. Readers can make what they can of these numbers.

In Part-2 I will be covering the following areas of analyses. If any reader comes out with a good suggestion it can be incorporated. I request that the readers do not ask for changes in players. I have completed a part of this analysis with one set of players and cannot abruptly follow-up with another set. The next part covers mostly performance oriented measures.

8. World Cup SF-F Champions Trophy Finals / Significant / Early matches
9. Batting Position / Boundary analysis
10. First & Second Innings analysis
11. Home / Neutral / Away analysis
12. Won / Lost matches analysis
13. Impact Inns / High Scoring Index / MOM analysis
14. Team share of runs/balls

Since I see many new readers I have to make my usual pitch regarding this specific blogspace, a small corner of "The Cordon". Please bear with me for this, just once.

I am always welcome to criticism and negative comments. In fact I value these a lot since new ideas flow and I can correct any blinkered views I have. But there is a clear line of propriety drawn for this particular blogspace. I had established that with "It Figures" and I had the best collection of informed readers who I respected and whose respect was my reward. When you come into this blogspace you are expected to follow these ground rules since you are here by invitation. If anyone makes a rude or insulting comment it only reflects his own shortcomings, not mine.

You will not insult me, any fellow reader or any player. That is the single commandment here. I have no problems with the following observations:

- Your analysis is based on a wrong premise.
- Your computations are wrong.
- Your analysis is statistically weak.
- You have over-complicated a simple issue.
- You have over-simplified a complex issue.
- You are not being fair to *.
- You have tried to solve a non-existing problem.
- Reader * is wrong/has not understood.
- Player * should retire.

I have problems with the following statements (and the like) and your comment will be junked instantly.

- You are stupid. Even if you have a Ph.D. in Statistics, you have no right to say that. I could, but never will, counter with a retort in far more colourful language.
- You favour players from *. Because, to me all countries are same.
- You favour *. Because I do not, and always leave my personal preferences aside.
- Reader * is stupid. Because he is not.
- Player * is selfish/greedy. Not in this forum.
- You are biased. I may publish this if I feel I can provide additional insight by answering this comment.

Finally let me say this unequivocally. I write for the average and interested cricket enthusiast who may or may not possess any serious statistical/mathematical qualifications. I do not write for the statistical/mathematical experts. Although I possess graduate-level statistical knowledge, I limit myself to Mean, Median, Mode, Standard Deviation, Quartiles, Normal Distribution and the like. I know that I will lose 75% of my readers the minute I bring in p-Value or z-Score.

I have only one avowed objective. I want my article to be understood by 95% of the visiting readers. I am not writing to get my articles published in the conferences of RSC or ISI or ASA. I am certain they would not be. Common sense is the cornerstone of my articles and I am proud of that. If I do not meet your expectations, my apologies and if you feel very strongly about it, au revoir.

Let me close with a short story. I had an excellent reader during the early years of "It Figures". Sometime back he stopped following the blog for various reasons. But he was never rude or insulting to me. I thanked him and said that the doors of this blogspace would always remain open since I valued his insights. I see that he has made a comment for the first article - to the point and that too, a point well-made. I never have any problems with readers like him.