Are cracks appearing in Sumathipala administration? (1 December 1998)
Are cracks appearing in Sumathipala administration
01-Dec-1998
1 December 1998
Are cracks appearing in Sumathipala administration?
By Sa'adi Thawfeeq
The abandonment of the Board of Control for Cricket in Sri Lanka's
(BCCSL) Extra-Ordinary General Meeting on Sunday leads one to
question whether there are any cracks appearing in the Thilanga
Sumathipala administration.
Sunday's unfortunate abandonment was due to the resolution not being
properly worded, which would have otherwise had legal implications,
if passed.
The BCCSL are seeking amendments to certain sections of its
constitution in order to fall in line with other International
Cricket Council (ICC) member countries.
At Sunday's meeting, the amendments itself were presented, but not in
the form of a resolution as required by Section 18 (b) of the BCCSL
constitution, which inter alia states: "All resolutions dealing with
the rights and privileges of membership subject to Rule 30 (c) or
alteration, addition or any amendment to the constitution shall be by
special resolution".
A reasonable section of the members present, strongly objected to the
amendments being discussed or passed at the EGM summoned for this
purpose in view of Section 18 (b) being violated.
This is the second occasion at which an EGM of the BCCSL to amend its
constitution had to be abandoned, due to inadequacies on the notice
issued to members. The first occasion was in August this year.
The secretary of the BCCSL has to take full responsibility of these
lapses and for the fiasco created in having two EGM's abandoned at
tremendous cost to the BCCSL.
We understand that the BCCSL engages legal consultants to fine comb
matters, such as the amendments to the constitution etc. With all
these expertise it is a sad reflection that the secretary has failed
in his duties to ensure that proper notice was issued for the
scheduled meetings.
Questions are also being asked by interested members as to why
Muthiah Muralitharan, with a serious injured arm was sent to Sharjah
for the Coca Cola trophy tournament. Muralitharan has still not
recovered from the injury and looks doubtful even for Australia. He
has been asked to undergo a fitness test.
A similar incident happened a few months before, when Chaminda Vaas
was sent to England on the guise of seeking treatment from the
physio. These incidents tend one to ask the question whether there is
a dearth of sports medicine experts in the country for the injured
players to be treated for an interim period.
It is also a sign of weak administration by the BCCSL to stop injured
players from going on tours. Not only have they got to pay the
players' tour fees, but also bear other costs.
The way things are moving right now, it does not augur well for the
Sumathipala administration. Expectations from the Sri Lankan and
international cricketing public must be maintained.
Sri Lanka are going to England for the World Cup next year as the
defending champions and everything has to be put in the proper
perspective to achieve the desired results.
One sad aspect is that while the other eight Test playing countries
will be involved in international series, leading up the World Cup,
Sri Lanka will not have any serious cricket till the World Cup in
May, after their tour of Australia ends in mid-February.
Source :: Daily News (https://www.lanka.net)