Time for a change?

Everyone's taking a pop at county cricket at the moment, and now that old workaholic county-pro-made-good Alec Stewart has had his two-penn'orth.

Speaking after receiving a lifetime achievement award at last night's Professional Cricketers Association dinner at the London Hilton, Stewart stressed the need for administrators to put the national side first, and insisted English-qualified players should be looked after first and foremost. Stewart said: "To me, the most important thing is that we produce the right number of international-class cricketers. Instead of having a bare 12, 13, 14, we've got to be producing 20. To do that, a lot of things need to be changed."

He continued: "We need to reduce the number of playing days and have more days when the players are able to practise and improve their skills. At the same time, I'd knock on the head the number of overseas players and EU passports that come into the game. I'd make sure that English cricketers, and English-qualified cricketers, are the ones who are looked after properly."

Stewart's comments came in the wake of endless calls for a domestic shake-up from other high-profile names. In this month's launch issue of The Wisden Cricketer Michael Vaughan laid down the law, and caused a stir, by saying that the amount of Championship cricket should be halved and played between Test matches. Meanwhile, Bob Willis has formed the Cricket Reform Group, a select band including another England captain in Michael Atherton, which has convened this season to discuss where English cricket has gone wrong, and what they can do about it.

In The Sunday Telegraph, Atherton wrote: "Few ... would disagree that there are fundamental problems: that the England team are inconsistent and underachieving (for more decades than just one); that the amount of money spent on the county game is disproportionate to its popularity and effectiveness as a breeding ground." And Athers, like others, suggested the same old remedy: "We would like to see a reduced county programme of fewer full-time professional teams - a concentration of the best English-qualified players to improve the standard of our first-class programme."

Atherton revealed that his suggestions were given short shrift by one or two cynics in the midst of England's fifth-Test wonder win at The Oval. But he argued that English cricket was at its most complacent after a rousing win to end the summer. Derek Pringle, writing in The Daily Telegraph, wasn't fooled either: "Behind the shop window, pessimism abounds as the county game tries to serve an ever-widening circle of masters on a dwindling budget."

In other words, they seemed to be saying, even though it has been an action-packed, exciting and sun-kissed season, underlying troubles are lurking just around the corner - namely financial ones. Pringle, splitting infinitives as deftly as he used to split the cover field, decreed: "What is certain is that no domestic game can properly flourish while trying to simultaneously meet the needs of broadcasters, Team England and county members, modest in number and financial clout though that last group are." And the fact that wages are spiralling doesn't help either. Surrey had to release Ian Ward and Alec Stewart because they couldn't afford to pay them, and Essex dumped five players for the same reason.

And then there's the problem of EU players. "Apart from the extra cost, it mocks the efforts of those involved in youth development, though nearly every club are guilty," said Pringle. As well as the 55 overseas players this season, another 29 were ineligible for England, playing here under European passports. That equals 84 players out of 379, or 22%.

So is anything going to be done about it? The county chairmen are understandably opposed the idea of merging, while a reduction in fixtures would presumably lead to a reduction in gate receipts. Nothing can be done about EU passport-holders without infringing European law, and England's fixture list next summer looks more like a four-month festival rather than an international schedule.

David Morgan, the chairman of the ECB, and Tim Lamb, the chief executive, have agreed to meet with the Cricket Reform Group. Morgan has already made it clear that none of the 18 first-class counties will be axed, but he does concede that the amount of cricket could be cut. It will be interesting to see how that meeting goes, in the face of increasing calls for change.