Wicket to Wicket
A model of hospitality
A strange phenomenon took place on England’s recent tour of Pakistan
Andrew Miller
25-Feb-2013
A strange phenomenon took place on England’s recent tour of Pakistan. During the first Test at Multan, and replicated thereafter across the country, there were scores of home supporters dressing up in English replica kit and red-and-white face-paint, and cheering on the visiting team.
Pakistani fans have received a bad press in recent years, largely as a consequence of the unruly scenes during the 2001 NatWest Series in England, when makeshift barriers had to be erected to prevent their over-exuberant fans from storming the pitch. But place these same folk on their home patch, and they form the very model of hospitality.
Take Karachi, for instance. A city in which Western cricket teams fear to tread, and where England were subjected to a fearful mauling in their one-off one-day match two months ago. The behaviour of the fans in the stands could hardly have been further removed from the perceived image of the city – and indeed of the country as a whole.
Full postRacism in the Caribbean...but not in the stands
Introduction | Peter English | Rahul Bhattacharya | Neil Manthorp
Vaneisa Baksh
25-Feb-2013
I have watched a lot of cricket in the West Indies and have never seen anything that made me feel uncomfortable in spectators' behaviour. I might be wrong. I might have been too absorbed to discern. I don't know. I am not unaware of its existence but - especially in Trinidad, where there is no easy way to tell racial ancestry any more - there is little of that in the crowd.
Full postOffensive naïvety
Introduction | Peter English | Rahul Bhattacharya
ESPNcricinfo staff
25-Feb-2013
The taxi driver in Sydney was lost and the clock was ticking. He didn't know where the SCG was but he had set off anyway, meter ticking. Now he'd pulled over and was inspecting the map book.
Eventually we arrived - at the wrong end of the stadium but at least we were there - but the clock was ticking and there was much to be written. Not, unfortunately. about the Test match, but about the racist taunts that had continued to smear the tour.
I bumped into a man eating a pie, a meat pie - the Australian national dish (or is it the 'Lamington'?) - but it was too hot inside and he lurched backwards from it as he took a bite. As if that would help.
Full postHit racism for six
Introduction | Peter English
Rahul Bhattacharya
25-Feb-2013
Update from Rahul, February 11
The Wasim Akram illustration in my post has attracted more pointed feedback than it was intended to, so perhaps it is best to elaborate.
First, the ICC (now headquartered in Dubai). Leave aside for a moment its shortcomings and look at the composition. It is presided over by a Pakistani, vice-presided over by a South African and its technical committee, which looks after almost all the cricketing aspects, is headed by an Indian. Its 10 permanent members include four Asian nations, two African nations and the West Indies.
Full postIt shouldn't be this uncomfortable
I find watching cricket from the stands is an awkward experience, and not because of the seats or the comfort of the press box
Peter English
25-Feb-2013
I find watching cricket from the stands is an awkward experience, and not because of the seats or the comfort of the press box. As a naïve child and teen the banter between the players and spectators seemed fun, but now when I’m in the crowd I spend it worrying about how the parents, children, pensioners and overseas visitors are enjoying their day. It started at the Gabba during the 1998-99 Ashes Test when I was at university and an elderly couple was regularly spilt with beer. We pretended not to see it and it was horrible – the damp grandparents and the lack of reaction.
This summer’s issue is the overflow of racist taunts and it’s time to stop turning uncomfortably away. South Africa’s players have reported being called “kaffirs” since the first Test in Perth in December and the unwelcome treatment has continued through the current VB Series, resulting in the ICC announcing an investigation into spectator behaviour at Australian grounds. Last week the Sri Lankans were called black c**** in Sydney and Adelaide, although no official complaint has come from team management. Each year the isolated incidents bank up into an account that grows more unhealthy by the summer.
Blaming the South African expats for the troubles is too easy, especially for anybody who has spent a third session in the old hill areas of Australian grounds. These problems are not limited to Australia, but this month it is our problem and the world is watching how we deal with it. A dob-in-a-racist-chanter might be one way, and providing general guidelines on what constitutes abuse might help with the community arrests. (Although spreading the information could make it worse.) There are certainly enough security guards at grounds who spend most of their time popping beach balls and avoiding verbal and liquid sprays themselves. It’s time to spike racism and appalling crowd behaviour so watching the game can be a more comfortable experience.
Full postCrowd behaviour in cricket
Welcome to our third discussion and debate on Wicket to Wicket
Will
25-Feb-2013
Welcome to our third discussion and debate on Wicket to Wicket. After
deliberating Indian cricket and the use of technology in umpiring, we
turn our attention to the thorny subject of crowd behaviour.
Much has been said and written about the racist tone to the crowd behaviour at Australian grounds recently. South Africa have made an official complaint; Sri Lanka are unhappy about the way Muttiah Muralitharan has been treated; and the ICC are holding an investigation into the allegations.
Though hooliganism has been a bane for football for years, it is a relatively recent phenomenon in cricket, and the comfort is that the authorities have been swift the grasp the danger it poses to the game.
A recent article by Peter English on the subject drew a
torrent of feedback from Cricinfo readers, prompting us to open up the discussion to a wider audience. Peter gets the ball rolling, and he will be joined next week by Rahul Bhattacharya, Andrew Miller, Neil Manthorp and Vaneisa Baksh.
Full postA week is a long time in Indian cricket
Earlier posts: intro , 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 .
Amit Varma
25-Feb-2013
We could go on talking on this subject endlessly, but it's time to bring this particular discussion to a close. My thanks to Ashok Malik, Devangshu Datta, Harsha Bhogle, Mukul Kesavan and Sambit Bal for taking part in it so enthusiastically, and for their insights. And also to those of you who took the time to comment and add value to the discussion.
Some of us were optimistic, some were not, but I think all of feel a sense of great hope for Indian cricket, and a tinge of despair that we can't actually do anything about it, that we must simply hope for the best. It's a roller-coaster ride for any Indian fan.
One day, well into a long streak of poor cricket, our coach and captain fight, as do BCCI officials over who will lead the board, and Indian cricket seems in turmoil. A few weeks later, we've beaten Sri Lanka 6-1 and the roses are out. Shortly after that South Africa is beating us and our coach is accused of showing his finger to the crowd. At every corner there is something unexpected, and no way of knowing whether things will get better or worse. We just watch and chew our nails, and it's a wonder we have any fingers left.
Full postOn strategy and tactics
Earlier posts: intro , 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 .
ESPNcricinfo staff
25-Feb-2013
OK. Definitions (for the benefit of readers rather than for Mukul).
"Strategy" is generally used to describe decisions/actions with broad long-term implications. "Tactics" is generally used for actions/decisions with short-term impact. For example, a decision to play two spinners/two fast bowlers is strategic whereas a decision to put an extra slip into the cordon when a quick man is bowling is tactical.
Now, Mukul had written:
Full postWhy cricket in India will thrive
Earlier posts: intro , 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 .
ESPNcricinfo staff
25-Feb-2013
If the pyramid of practitioners has a large base, we are likely to have more sporting talent thrown up. Russia has a population of 125 million chessplayers and it possesses an outstanding array of chessplaying talent. The US has a base of 6 million bridgeplayers and it throws up an outstanding array of bridgeplaying talent.
Can we assume that a larger based pyramid will always throw up the best talent and produce the best results? This may not be true. Australia has a far smaller base of cricketers than England/India/Bangladesh. It still identifies more talent and nurtures it better.
Full postWhat Gavaskar and Viswanath didn't have
Earlier posts: intro , 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 .
ESPNcricinfo staff
25-Feb-2013
A few reactions to what some of my fellow participants in this discussion have said:
With regard to Harsha's post, I'd say that the incentive structure has indeed changed. The superstars are now entrepreneurs - they don't hold sports-quota jobs. It is entirely upto them how much money they can leverage out of their talent. This wasn't true in any earlier era where even the Gavaskars and Viswanaths collected salaries as employees.
Of course, that changes priorities for a sportsman and it may lead to stronger performance since performance is more clearly linked to reward.
Full postMost Read
Writers