Lalit Modi was brilliant in relocating the entire tournament from India to South Africa at less than a month's notice • AFP
The creators and owners of the Indian Premier League pulled off one of the
greatest feats of logistical management in sports history by moving the entire
tournament from India to South Africa at less than a month's notice. The selfstyled
IPL "commissioner" Lalit Modi and his team were impossibly brilliant,
almost too clever to comprehend, in relocating rather than postponing or
cancelling when the Indian government refused to guarantee security at certain
venues because the dates coincided with national elections in the world's
largest democracy.
It was pretty obvious, even to the diffident and disinterested, that moving
the tournament en masse to South Africa was a big deal but, just in case
anybody was in any doubt, Modi announced it and pronounced it. Over and
over again.
The numbers were almost universally huge, from the 1,000-plus visas the
South African government issued in 24 hours (as opposed to the customary ten
working days) to more than 40,000 hotel-room nights, and the alleged $US50m
by which South Africa's economy benefited.
One number which was conspicuously low in the greater scheme of things
was the $1m paid to Cricket South Africa and its affiliates to bleach their
stadiums of adverts, vacate their offices and leave behind their finest wines for
the approaching hordes. "We took a very pragmatic view," said a CSA
committee member just days after the Deccan Chargers had swapped the
wooden spoon for the not-so-subtle winners trophy, encrusted with rubies and
yellow and blue sapphires. "Was it worth our while as a cricket board, with
member unions feeling trampled on and taken advantage of, with their own
members marginalised and unable to make use of executive suites they have
owned for 15 years? Probably not. But were we in a position to say no when
so many other South Africans could benefit? And when future relations
between our countries were considered? Definitely not."
So did South Africa bend over backwards to accommodate the IPL in order
to curry favour in future years? "Everyone knows who butters the bread in
world cricket these days, and it isn't necessarily us," said the CSA official.
Of more concern to the global game, however, especially given the millions
of dollars so boastfully generated by the tournament, was the absence of the
ICC's Anti Corruption and Security Unit. All the ingredients for temptation
were there. Some mega-rich, egotistical team owners and their hundreds of
hangers-on, a cavernous divergence in salaries between players and, crucially,
no natural guard against impropriety in the form of national pride or a sense of
history.
The IPL did, in fact, enquire about making use of the ACSU, but baulked at
the quoted price-tag of more than $1m, even though that was a pittance in the
context of the overall budget. Instead, they appointed a private South African
security company, Nicholls Steyn&Associates to cover security arrangements.
An extraordinary 11th-hour about-turn saw the Indian board request the
ACSU's involvement the day before the tournament began, but it was made
clear that the job involved a lot more than standing in dressing-room doorways
looking out for dodgy blokes in sunglasses. A minimum of six to eight weeks
of research and preparation was required.
Consequently the tournament was awash with events and happenings
regarded, more often than not, as peculiar, when they may have been innocent.
Late-night franchise parties involved hundreds of guests, most seeking the
attention of the eight or nine big-name Indian players and other internationals
which every team boasted. It was simply not right and proper, although there
was no evidence any of them was approached, that many of the world's best
players were exposed to wealthy and influential "fans" at midnight.
The ACSU was not completely excluded, however. Its general manager and
chief investigator, Ravi Sawani, along with one of his staff, briefed five of the
eight teams, while a couple of the regional security managers supervised the
locals hired to perform their usual role. But it was a lukewarm compromise.
While no doubt eyebrows were raised on the field, too, when they need not
have been. Sudden promotions to open the bowling or a string of batting
failures were innocent extremes of experimentation and form, some were open
to misinterpretation and an official stamp from the game's most qualified
authorities would have quelled the bar and bookie talk.
Common sense prevailed in the months after the tournament when IPL
officials confirmed that ACSU surveillance had been commissioned for the
third year of the IPL, when it will presumably be back on Indian soil.
For all the scars and scabs the tournament left behind, there can be no
doubting the veracity of the vainglorious yells of success from the organisers.
Thousands of tickets were given away, but so what - many stadiums were full,
and even the ones that weren't were at 60% capacity. The enormous Indian
population in Lenasia, a suburb of Johannesburg, ensured that the Wanderers
had few empty seats, while Durban, home to the largest Indian diaspora outside
the subcontinent, was positively humming with IPL fever.
The bling and glam of the Indian nouveau riche was obnoxious to many
who were exposed to it, but to the majority of locals the tournament had a
strong novelty value, the tickets were cheap, and it was never over-exposed in
one region for too long. It was backed up with a preposterously huge
advertising campaign (ten times greater than anything Cricket South Africa
had ever been able to spend on a series) and the country was awash with the
IPL to such an extent that even cricket-watching virgins felt compelled to see
what all the fuss was about. Or some did, at least.
On the field Matthew Hayden and Adam Gilchrist shone like men a decade
away from retirement, not in the first year of the slippers-and-pipe stage of
their careers. Other "oldies" blossomed, too, such as Anil Kumble, while some
of the "stars" who failed to shine first time around finally came good - like the
locals Jacques Kallis and Mark Boucher.
The result was that the two teams who finished in the bottom two places in
2007-08 contested the final a year later: the Deccan Chargers (captained by
Gilchrist) and the Royal Challengers from Bangalore. The Challengers were brought together by Anil Kumble after a poor start under Kevin Pietersen, one
of several England players who failed to shine. Andrew Flintoff's bowling,
and his lack of a slower ball, proved costly for Chennai before he was injured;
Paul Collingwood and Owais Shah could not get a game for Delhi, and the
only redemption came from Ravi Bopara in a matchwinning innings of 84 for
Kings XI Punjab. The most expensive and glamorous of the franchises,
however, the Kolkata Knight Riders, finished dead last and became the
laughing stock of the league when an anonymous online blogger posted a
series of embarrassingly accurate accounts of life inside the camp under the
increasingly eccentric coaching of John Buchanan and philanthropic hedonism
of owner Shah Rukh Khan. Buchanan was sacked a couple of months later.
As a sports and entertainment package, it was big. Very big. It was even
good at times, too. As a cricket package, however, it was small. Sometimes
very small. Modi has many of the elements which comprise genius, including
an intractable belief in everything he does. One of his stated ambitions is for
IPL franchises to become popular enough to challenge the world's great
football teams for global following. Kings XI Punjab versus Real Madrid,
Delhi Daredevils take on Manchester United…
It may even happen, but it will always be a superficial and fickle popularity
because even the most fanatical sports following depends on the quality of the
product, and so long as IPL teams are limited to playing just four internationals
and a couple of Indian stars, the standard of cricket played will always be
compromised.
The glass ceiling imposed on teams by the compulsory inclusion of four or
five junior players in every starting XI may benefit certain aspects of Indian
cricket, but the tournament - while that system remains in place - will never
grow beyond the status of circus, albeit one with a bigger marquee and more
clowns than any before. In cricket, anyway.